LioninVa wrote:I don’t disagree, _dad. Do you really think one man saying we will stop it was anything more than trying to impress the girl? You are smart enough to know how things work.
That might be more plausible if he wasn't already banging her and he wasn't neck deep in the tanking of the HRC investigation and the initiation of DT investigation. She was already impressed enough to have an out of wedlock affair with a co-worker (about a big a no no as you can do in the intelligence agency) and he clearly took actions that backed up what was implied in the text.
I know people who do contract work with gov't and have to get security clearances and I can tell you if they were married and had an affair and used a government phone to conduct said affair and implied questionable actions regarding an election they would have that clearance yanked out their hands so fast they would get 3rd degree burns.